1. Benvenuto/a sul forum di Tennis-Tavolo.com! Iscriviti è GRATUITO!
    Iscrivendoti con il pulsante qui a destra potrai partecipare attivamente nelle discussioni, pubblicare video e foto, accedere al mercatino e conoscere tanti amici che condividono la tua passione per il TennisTavolo. Cosa aspetti? L'iscrizione è gratuita! Sei già registrato/a e non ricordi la password? Clicca QUI.
  2. Clicca QUI per risparmiate sugli acquisti con le offerte di Amazon.it

recensione spin art comparata con t05 (inglese)

Discussione in 'Consigli & Test sui Materiali' iniziata da andras, 19 Apr 2010.

Status Discussione:
ATTENZIONE! - L'ultima risposta a questa discussione ha più di 365 giorni!
Valuta se potrebbe aver senso aprire una nuova discussione sull'argomento o se il tuo intervento possa essere utile ad essa.
  1. andras

    andras Utente Noto

    Nome e Cognome:
    Riccardo Belli
    Categoria Atleta:
    4a Cat.
    Squadra:
    T.T. MONDOVI'
    Recensione sulla spinart presa da mytt. ciao

    I played with the new rubber today, two trainings about two hours each. On the other side of the blade, I used T05 2.1mm for the first session, and a brand new sheet of DHS Hurricane 3 Neo 2.15mm for the second session. So I will basically try to give a comparison between these rubbers. I have never played before with Spin Art (obviously) and DHS H3 Neo (National Version).

    What I will write here are of course my personal impressions after only four hours of exercising, so I may be mistaken considering certain statements, and others might feel differnt.

    Is the Spin Art better than the T05? Yes. No. Maybe. Better than the H3 Neo? Probably.

    Weight:
    I missed to weight the rubbers, but the Spin Art has about the same weight as the T05 (my blade is 184 gr with T05 both sides, 183 with T05 and Spin Art, and 177 with Spin Art and H3 Neo.

    Speed:
    The T05 is the fastest rubber by far, and Spin Art is notably faster than H3 Neo.

    Hardness:
    The Spin Art is the hardest by far.

    Tackiness:
    Spin Art and H3 Neo are similar. You can lift the ball when the rubber is brand new, when it will fall off after a bit less than a second or so. After first cleaning with your hand, the obvious tackiness is gone. However, Spin Art still plays tacky. It never happened to me that the ball did slip on the rubber, soft blocks of slow loops with loads of spin worked just fine. No slipping of the ball, never, at least when the rubber is still as new as mine.

    Catapult:
    The T05 has the strongest catapult effect by far, but the Spin Art has still a much stronger catapult effect than the H3 Neo. However, you need to hit quite hard till the catapult of the Spin Art starts kicking in.

    Spin:
    Hard to say. My personal impression was that the T05 can produce the largest amount of spin, but my training partner who has to deal with my loops (pushes and serves) said that the Spin Art produces the largest amount of spin in all aspects of the game, whereas with T05 and H3 Neo, it depends on the situation. My misinterpretation probably arises as a consequence of the smaller catapult, where the T05 just seems to produce such hilarious spin.

    Looping/Counter-looping:
    This is the fun part. The T05 surely produces faster loops. However, loops can be played with more spin and variation with the Spin Art. Further, although I have never played with a rubber with such a hard sponge, I instantaneously had more control, in particular at first loops. The H3 Neo is quite a bit slower and you need to work much harder, but it has similar advantages for first loops like the Spin Art.
    Considering counter-looping far off the table, I so much love the T05. Counter-looping with it gives you such a sensation due to its tremendous catapult. So by now, the Spin Art feels somehow wrong here. Nevertheless, with its hard sponge and its catapult at harder strokes, it plays very well. I was more solid than with the T05. The H3 Neo looses the competition of counter-looping far of the table.
    Counter-loops close to the table are much easier with both the Spin Art and the H3 Neo for me. Many balls go to long with the T05.

    Blocking:
    I prefer Spin Art, than T05, and I do not really like the H3 Neo, somehow lacks consistency when you do not use your own force. The difference between T05 and Spin Art is mainly that the balls do not dig in so heavily with the Spin Art, adding consistency.

    Chops:
    Spin Art rules for me.

    Serves:
    I often have the problem that my serves go long with the T05 when I try to put spin on the ball. I did not have this problem with the Spin Art, I could consistently serve short with heavy spin (though I actually rarely serve short with heavy spin in a match). Several serves were way to short with the H3 Neo (but this probably means that I could produce even more spin on serves with it if I would get used to it).

    Flicks:
    Spin Art is just perfect with its hard sponge for me on my forehand, and I had tremendous difficulties to use it on my backhand considering that point. It seems that I just can't get the rubber to work because the ball does not dig in if you use no power.

    Overall:
    Although Spin Art is much slower than T05 and has much less catapult), I will keep it on my forehand for further tests. For me, it excels in serving, first loops, blocks and chops. I like it because I have simply more control in all aspects of the game (on my forehand). It is no good backhand rubber for me at this stage, because here I need more catapult to return serves in a offensive manner. Maybe I'm just stoked and over-optimistic...
     
  2. bvzm71

    bvzm71 Old style, but looking to the future

    Nome e Cognome:
    Igno #1
    Qualifica Tecnico:
    Tecnico di Base FITeT
    Categoria Atleta:
    4a Cat.
    Squadra:
    TT Athletic Club Genova & Lavagna
    Letta tutta di un fiato .. interessante.
    Presa con le dovute accortezze, visto che non conosciamo il "tester", puo' servire un paragone tra Ten 05 e Neo Hurr 3 (anche per il peso).

    Non ho mai visto questa Spin Art e voi ? :confused:
     
  3. neko

    neko Utente Attivo

    Nome e Cognome:
    francesco fabbri
    Squadra:
    alfieri di romagna
    la sin art uscirà da poco e arà asieme alle tenergy e alle tenrgy fx la nuova gomma di punta della butterfly.....è essenzialmente una tackifire c sopra tensionato con piuma tenergy rossa porosa
     
  4. bvzm71

    bvzm71 Old style, but looking to the future

    Nome e Cognome:
    Igno #1
    Qualifica Tecnico:
    Tecnico di Base FITeT
    Categoria Atleta:
    4a Cat.
    Squadra:
    TT Athletic Club Genova & Lavagna
    .... e allora costerà un botto !! :p :D
     
  5. Cloud 88

    Cloud 88 Utente

    Categoria Atleta:
    Promozionale
    Quasi 50! forse 48? Non ricordo comunque oltre i 40!:eek::eek:
     
  6. andras

    andras Utente Noto

    Nome e Cognome:
    Riccardo Belli
    Categoria Atleta:
    4a Cat.
    Squadra:
    T.T. MONDOVI'
    Non è proprio come la tack.chop questa teoricamente è una gomma offensiva stile tacky la t.chop era molto + difensiva all- .
    Si la piuma è molto dura ma il top sembrerebbe + morbido in stile xiom vega.
    il prezzo di listino è veramente uno sproposito ma probabilmete dopo un po' finirà + o-come le tenergy.
     
Status Discussione:
ATTENZIONE! - L'ultima risposta a questa discussione ha più di 365 giorni!
Valuta se potrebbe aver senso aprire una nuova discussione sull'argomento o se il tuo intervento possa essere utile ad essa.

Condividi questa Pagina